Saturday, February 08, 2003
Sir Real and the British Un-Intelligence
Slactivist provides links, explanations and information on the dissolving case for war as presented by Colin Powell Wednesday, and the impressive display of Un-intelligence by the British government in plagarizing the document that may help to launch a war.
Don't blame me if an extreme feeling of unreality sets in while reading this.
Don't blame me if an extreme feeling of unreality sets in while reading this.
# posted by scorpiorising : 6:16 PM |
Roll Over, George Orwell, Roll Over
Here is the PBS breaking news site that published links to the draft of the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003.The "closely guarded" draft was leaked to the Center for Public Integrity, a non-partisan group. George Orwell can't get a decent night's rest these days.
According to the 20th century glossary, appeasement is the act of giving in to our enemies in order to avoid war. Our country drips with appeasement. It is oozing through every nook and crany of sidewalk gulches. It is our democratic representatives and senators appeasing Bush and Bush doctrine, for the lack of spine to fight it, for the few crumbs he throws their way, to look good to the voters, for fear of looking soft on terrorism, for fear of being lumped on the "losing" side. France and Germany's lack of support of Bush doctrine is appeasement of Iraq. Courageously, they are refusing to appease Bush and refusing to endorse an ill-thought possible war that could result in disaster for the Middle East and this old world. Middle Eastern countries are engaging in the appeasement of Bush, to what will be their own detriment. Do they really think Bush will give them all of the aid they will need to deal with the millions of refugees that will result from this war? He's going to leave them hanging and let the U.N. deal with it. To appease is to admit defeat without even staging a fight. Senator Edward Kennedy has never appeased the Bush doctrine. Many senators have. Shame, shame shame on the policy of appeasement.
According to the 20th century glossary, appeasement is the act of giving in to our enemies in order to avoid war. Our country drips with appeasement. It is oozing through every nook and crany of sidewalk gulches. It is our democratic representatives and senators appeasing Bush and Bush doctrine, for the lack of spine to fight it, for the few crumbs he throws their way, to look good to the voters, for fear of looking soft on terrorism, for fear of being lumped on the "losing" side. France and Germany's lack of support of Bush doctrine is appeasement of Iraq. Courageously, they are refusing to appease Bush and refusing to endorse an ill-thought possible war that could result in disaster for the Middle East and this old world. Middle Eastern countries are engaging in the appeasement of Bush, to what will be their own detriment. Do they really think Bush will give them all of the aid they will need to deal with the millions of refugees that will result from this war? He's going to leave them hanging and let the U.N. deal with it. To appease is to admit defeat without even staging a fight. Senator Edward Kennedy has never appeased the Bush doctrine. Many senators have. Shame, shame shame on the policy of appeasement.
# posted by scorpiorising : 7:42 AM |
Friday, February 07, 2003
Is this the Year, 1984?
I feel real fear today for what the government is trying to do. A secret draft legislation to expand the powers of the government in fighting terrorism, including a possible military draft, was obtained by the non-partisan Center for Public Integrity, according to Bill Moyer's PBS Now site. Bill Moyers will address the issue at 9pm on PBS tonight. He will talk to Chuck Lewis, who is with the Center for Public Integrity. The draft legislation is called The Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003. Keep a watchful eye on this one.
# posted by scorpiorising : 5:24 PM |
Thursday, February 06, 2003
Corporate "Carpet-Bagger" Media
I would like to expound on my belief that the corporate media "stole" away our right to dissenting views. When we as citizens did little to protest the auctioning off of our media to huge, multi-national corporations, perhaps it is more fair to say we abdicated our right to dissension. Essentially, for a very low price I might add, compared to the relative worth of what was purchased, the corporate world gained a monopoly in views expressed. Not many talk about objectivity in journalism anymore. Perhaps it never existed. It is my belief that what we choose to report on, and how we report it, is always filtered through not only the belief systems of the reporters, but of the various managerial positions who control editing content, as well as the beliefs of the masses the media is reporting to. We hear what we want to hear, based on our belief systems. With the control of the media in the hands of corporate America, including radio and newspaper, an ascendant of beliefs took place, relative to those who now own the media, and those that are chosen to report the media. The people who eventually became reporters and talking heads for these
corporate owned giants, must by the very nature of reality, share the beliefs, to a great extent, of the owners. Already, MSNBC is talking of canning Phil Donahue. Try as he might, and did, he doesn't fit in well with the corporate view of the world. He is not as willing as, well as the "media whores", to quash dissenting views and feelings within himself, in order to fit the mold and keep his job. He ought to be glad they are talking of canning him; it is a tribute to his integrity.
But a media reports only what the masses truly want to hear. I'm not going to let Joe-citizen off the hook. We are perhaps one of the most poorly informed democratic citizenry on the planet. We have, again, abdicated the running of our "democracy" to the very rich who can afford to run for office. Most don't participate at all in any kind of democratic process, including the right to vote.
American largely have descended into a collective amnesia in terms of how this country was formed, and what gave it life. It wasn't the power of the gun that gave it life, it was the power of the pen. If it weren't for Thomas Paine's"Common Sense", the presence of guns in the colonies would have been irrelevant.
corporate owned giants, must by the very nature of reality, share the beliefs, to a great extent, of the owners. Already, MSNBC is talking of canning Phil Donahue. Try as he might, and did, he doesn't fit in well with the corporate view of the world. He is not as willing as, well as the "media whores", to quash dissenting views and feelings within himself, in order to fit the mold and keep his job. He ought to be glad they are talking of canning him; it is a tribute to his integrity.
But a media reports only what the masses truly want to hear. I'm not going to let Joe-citizen off the hook. We are perhaps one of the most poorly informed democratic citizenry on the planet. We have, again, abdicated the running of our "democracy" to the very rich who can afford to run for office. Most don't participate at all in any kind of democratic process, including the right to vote.
American largely have descended into a collective amnesia in terms of how this country was formed, and what gave it life. It wasn't the power of the gun that gave it life, it was the power of the pen. If it weren't for Thomas Paine's"Common Sense", the presence of guns in the colonies would have been irrelevant.
# posted by scorpiorising : 6:10 AM |
Wednesday, February 05, 2003
Why This Blog
I have been inspired to begin this blog to participate in perhaps what is possibly a rebirth of true democracy. It doesn't cost very much to post this blog, a few dollars a year. But is is like having my own news channel. I'm not a millionaire, or a well-heeled (and well-paid) reporter for one of the corporate owned media outlets. Yet my blog is accessible to thousands, to anyone with some sort of internet access who cares to read it.
The blogs are a foil to corporate media. And if we aren't carefull, we might actually create a true democracy here. Democracy in my view, must have a way to communicate dissenting views. The corporate media stole this away from us, and we took it back with the help of the internet.
I am reminded of our own revolutionaries, in the beginning of our country, the likes of Thomas Paine, who published dissenting pamphlets such as "Common Sense". "Common Sense", with its call for independence, was instrumental in fueling the birth of this nation. According to www.striketheroot.com, "Common Sense" became the best-selling pamphlet ever published in the Engish language. We already know the power of the blogs to challenge hypocricy in the case of the two Lotts, Trent and John. I find the blogs extremely useful in touching upon issues that are over-looked or ignored by our corporate media. They are a dissenting, alternative voice to the views of the wealthy elite who own almost all of the media in this country.
Plutocrats beware! There is a scent of democracy in the country again.
Today Colin Powell gave his speech to the U.N. producing "evidence" to back a war against Iraq. On the blog "Eschaton" today, Atrios posted a picture of Colin Powell holding what might be a vial of anthrax, during the speech. Some very funny posts in the comments, if it all weren't so tragic. As far as the corporate media is concerned, it is not "if", but "when" we invade Iraq.
It is twilight; the light is soft green-blue. I suppose I should watch the evening news. All of the same. All of this. It is amazing how we glide and slide over our rationalizations and justifications, yet few mention the over-kill that is going to happen. "Shock and Awe"? How about "Maim and Kill"?
The blogs are a foil to corporate media. And if we aren't carefull, we might actually create a true democracy here. Democracy in my view, must have a way to communicate dissenting views. The corporate media stole this away from us, and we took it back with the help of the internet.
I am reminded of our own revolutionaries, in the beginning of our country, the likes of Thomas Paine, who published dissenting pamphlets such as "Common Sense". "Common Sense", with its call for independence, was instrumental in fueling the birth of this nation. According to www.striketheroot.com, "Common Sense" became the best-selling pamphlet ever published in the Engish language. We already know the power of the blogs to challenge hypocricy in the case of the two Lotts, Trent and John. I find the blogs extremely useful in touching upon issues that are over-looked or ignored by our corporate media. They are a dissenting, alternative voice to the views of the wealthy elite who own almost all of the media in this country.
Plutocrats beware! There is a scent of democracy in the country again.
Today Colin Powell gave his speech to the U.N. producing "evidence" to back a war against Iraq. On the blog "Eschaton" today, Atrios posted a picture of Colin Powell holding what might be a vial of anthrax, during the speech. Some very funny posts in the comments, if it all weren't so tragic. As far as the corporate media is concerned, it is not "if", but "when" we invade Iraq.
It is twilight; the light is soft green-blue. I suppose I should watch the evening news. All of the same. All of this. It is amazing how we glide and slide over our rationalizations and justifications, yet few mention the over-kill that is going to happen. "Shock and Awe"? How about "Maim and Kill"?
# posted by scorpiorising : 6:19 PM |
Links
- Google News
- HOME
- Contact Me
- WAR CASUALTIES(MY OTHER BLOG)
- BAGHDAD BURNING
- UNQUALIFIED OFFERINGS
- JUAN COLE*INFORMED COMMENT*
- BRAD DELONG
- TOMPAINE.COM
- THE DAILY HOWLER
- DISSENT MAGAZINE
- CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY
- BLAH3.COM
- BLACK SUNDAE
- WAMPUM
- ESCHATON
- ARMS AND THE MAN
- MILL ON LIBERTY
- GERMANY IN WORLD WAR 2
- VEILED 4 ALLAH
- BUSY, BUSY, BUSY
- UNENVIABLE SITUATION
- HOW TO SAVE THE WORLD
- MATTHEW GROSS
- WHISKEY BAR
- WAR AND PIECE
- DAILY KOS
- GREG PALAST
- BLACK COMMENTATOR
- SURPRISING PATTERN OF FLORIDA'S ELECTION RESULTS
- THE BRAD BLOG
- THE OPEN VOTING CONSORTIUM
- BLACK BOX VOTING
- THE FREE PRESS
- VOTERGATE.TV
- STOLEN ELECTION. AMERICA HIJACKED
- An examination of the Florida election
- blueflu.us
- U.S. Election Controversies and Irregularities
- MY DD
- SEEING THE FOREST
- THERE IS NO CRISIS
- VELVET REVOLUTION
- 02/02/2003 - 02/09/2003
- 02/09/2003 - 02/16/2003
- 02/16/2003 - 02/23/2003
- 02/23/2003 - 03/02/2003
- 03/02/2003 - 03/09/2003
- 03/09/2003 - 03/16/2003
- 03/16/2003 - 03/23/2003
- 03/23/2003 - 03/30/2003
- 03/30/2003 - 04/06/2003
- 04/06/2003 - 04/13/2003
- 04/13/2003 - 04/20/2003
- 04/20/2003 - 04/27/2003
- 04/27/2003 - 05/04/2003
- 05/04/2003 - 05/11/2003
- 05/11/2003 - 05/18/2003
- 05/18/2003 - 05/25/2003
- 05/25/2003 - 06/01/2003
- 06/01/2003 - 06/08/2003
- 06/08/2003 - 06/15/2003
- 06/15/2003 - 06/22/2003
- 06/22/2003 - 06/29/2003
- 06/29/2003 - 07/06/2003
- 07/06/2003 - 07/13/2003
- 07/13/2003 - 07/20/2003
- 07/20/2003 - 07/27/2003
- 07/27/2003 - 08/03/2003
- 08/03/2003 - 08/10/2003
- 08/10/2003 - 08/17/2003
- 08/17/2003 - 08/24/2003
- 09/07/2003 - 09/14/2003
- 09/14/2003 - 09/21/2003
- 09/21/2003 - 09/28/2003
- 09/28/2003 - 10/05/2003
- 10/05/2003 - 10/12/2003
- 10/12/2003 - 10/19/2003
- 10/19/2003 - 10/26/2003
- 10/26/2003 - 11/02/2003
- 11/02/2003 - 11/09/2003
- 11/09/2003 - 11/16/2003
- 11/16/2003 - 11/23/2003
- 11/23/2003 - 11/30/2003
- 11/30/2003 - 12/07/2003
- 12/14/2003 - 12/21/2003
- 01/11/2004 - 01/18/2004
- 01/18/2004 - 01/25/2004
- 01/25/2004 - 02/01/2004
- 02/01/2004 - 02/08/2004
- 02/08/2004 - 02/15/2004
- 02/22/2004 - 02/29/2004
- 05/23/2004 - 05/30/2004
- 09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004
- 10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004
- 10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004
- 10/17/2004 - 10/24/2004
- 10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004
- 10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004
- 11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004
- 11/14/2004 - 11/21/2004
- 11/21/2004 - 11/28/2004
- 11/28/2004 - 12/05/2004
- 12/05/2004 - 12/12/2004
- 12/19/2004 - 12/26/2004
- 12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005
- 01/02/2005 - 01/09/2005
- 01/09/2005 - 01/16/2005
- 01/23/2005 - 01/30/2005
- 01/30/2005 - 02/06/2005
- 02/06/2005 - 02/13/2005
- 02/13/2005 - 02/20/2005
- 02/20/2005 - 02/27/2005
- 02/27/2005 - 03/06/2005
- 03/06/2005 - 03/13/2005
- 03/13/2005 - 03/20/2005
- 03/20/2005 - 03/27/2005
- 03/27/2005 - 04/03/2005
- 04/03/2005 - 04/10/2005
- 04/24/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 06/05/2005 - 06/12/2005
- 06/26/2005 - 07/03/2005
- 07/31/2005 - 08/07/2005
- 08/07/2005 - 08/14/2005