Thursday, February 20, 2003
Red Flags
I am also disheartened by the trashing of the French right now, for their dissension of the war. Are we as individual citizens next?
I must say though, that signs of empire building and imperialism out of control have been around for some time, practiced in varying degrees by nations all over the world. The Bush administration is Frankenstein, but his creator is, well, all of us, and the French, and the Germans, and NATO, etc., etc. It was complacency of the average citizen that allowed the machine to get out of control. We stopped questioning. We were satisfied with the news that was handed to us. Our leaders were relatively sane, or so we thought. Clinton's presidency and economic success added to the atmosphere of all is right with the world.
The Clinton and Nato bombing of Belgrade and Clinton and British bombing of Baghdad, in "peaceful" times, were red flags of warning.
It was on June 27, 1993 that Clinton decided to bomb Baghdad. Check out the aforementioned link and enjoy the de ja view .Note the types of neighborhoods destroyed. On March 23, 1999, Nato and the U.S. began bombing Belgrade. NATO was accused of war crimes during that campaign. Not to mention all of the stray bombs that fell here and there.
Wouldn't it be honorable and courageous of Clinton to admit he was wrong in the bombing of Baghdad, of Belgrade? Wouldn't this help the cause of peace?
The atrocity in Rowanda, with French complicity, another red flag. The Belgians are complicit, and the U.N., the U.S. knew of the planned exterminations. The Hutu massacre of Tutsi peoples happened under Clinton's watch.
Heck, throw a rock in the air and you'll hit someone guilty.
NATO aided the U.S. in the bombing of Belgrad. NATO, to their credit, opposed the bombing of Baghdad, while the American media was complicit in their approval.
The reasons for bombing or not bombing any given country, by any other country, at any given time, shift with the political wind. And it is an ill-wind, folks, that blows.
Where was I when all of this was happening during the "peaceful" Clinton presidency? Sitting with my thumb up my ass, like so many of us...eh?
I must say though, that signs of empire building and imperialism out of control have been around for some time, practiced in varying degrees by nations all over the world. The Bush administration is Frankenstein, but his creator is, well, all of us, and the French, and the Germans, and NATO, etc., etc. It was complacency of the average citizen that allowed the machine to get out of control. We stopped questioning. We were satisfied with the news that was handed to us. Our leaders were relatively sane, or so we thought. Clinton's presidency and economic success added to the atmosphere of all is right with the world.
The Clinton and Nato bombing of Belgrade and Clinton and British bombing of Baghdad, in "peaceful" times, were red flags of warning.
It was on June 27, 1993 that Clinton decided to bomb Baghdad. Check out the aforementioned link and enjoy the de ja view .Note the types of neighborhoods destroyed. On March 23, 1999, Nato and the U.S. began bombing Belgrade. NATO was accused of war crimes during that campaign. Not to mention all of the stray bombs that fell here and there.
Wouldn't it be honorable and courageous of Clinton to admit he was wrong in the bombing of Baghdad, of Belgrade? Wouldn't this help the cause of peace?
The atrocity in Rowanda, with French complicity, another red flag. The Belgians are complicit, and the U.N., the U.S. knew of the planned exterminations. The Hutu massacre of Tutsi peoples happened under Clinton's watch.
Heck, throw a rock in the air and you'll hit someone guilty.
NATO aided the U.S. in the bombing of Belgrad. NATO, to their credit, opposed the bombing of Baghdad, while the American media was complicit in their approval.
The reasons for bombing or not bombing any given country, by any other country, at any given time, shift with the political wind. And it is an ill-wind, folks, that blows.
Where was I when all of this was happening during the "peaceful" Clinton presidency? Sitting with my thumb up my ass, like so many of us...eh?
# posted by scorpiorising : 6:58 AM |
Wednesday, February 19, 2003
????
Some of my writing sounds a wee bit pompous, with a touch of bombasity thrown in??? Oh well, its all for a good cause. And its fun.
# posted by scorpiorising : 7:45 PM |
Rant
I sure did rant about fascism earlier. I think all in all it was a fairly thoughtful rant. Of course, you the reader must come to your own conclusions. Don't take my rant for it.
Yesterday, Rosebud and I rented the Jean Genet film: Querelle . Rosebud had treated me with so much kindness, that I soared for a good part of the evening. My mind had already felt speedy, though I was physically tired.
I had a kind of encounter with Grace. I felt suddenly that everything in the room possessed consciousness. Every cell of human and "inanimate" object glowed with awareness. Of course, the states and conditions of awareness varied. Won't they always vary, yet possess similarity? I felt a mild detachment from concern for the state of the world, for myself as a sentient being. I even felt a kind of it doesn't really matter what happens to us because we will all continue. I don't believe the detachment was a value judgement on the worth of existing, but as a distancing from the "if" of existing.
"If" this or that happens, then this might happen, which might trigger that, and on and on and on.
Rosebud and I discussed the mental traps that become habitual. Paranoia was one that was discussed. I told him that someone shared with me recently this thought: that it is not my business what someone else thinks of me.
I suppose that statement is helpful, up to a point. To extend it, it is my business if someone wants to do harm to me.
Rosebud seemed to like the statement. We also talked about how we hypnotize ourselves with beliefs. When we state a point of view, it is a belief, and therefore is entirely created by the person stating it, and is entirely subjective.
My rant on fascism was a collection of beliefs. Those beliefs will be filtered through the beliefs of others, and they will come to their own views.
We decided it is possible to hypnotize ourselves into believing we have certain physical maladies, so that we hang onto them much longer than is necessary. We believe we are powerless in the face of physical pain. Rosebud's hand hurt and ached. He is convincing himself that he has arthritis. I am afraid he may convince himself that he will always have it. He did seem to suddenly question that assumption as we talked.
Rosebud's artist friend, Sergie from downstairs paid us a visit. He comes from the far east and he likes Wadka. He stated a belief that it is possible to learn to be reasonable when drinking. "The old people,"he said. "When you talk to them, they tell you that they only drink this much", and he held his index finger and thumb apart about 2-3 inches. "I think if you can hold it down to that much, you will be okay."
Rosebud has two paintings of Sergie's on his wall. One painting is of what looks like an alien/human hybrid. The other painting is a bushy, green landscape. Rosebud had told me that Sergie doesn't like his own paintings, and often paints over them. The landscape had been painted on a canvas that was washed with a kind of lavender color. Sergie said the painting is meant to depict summer. The washed out lavender color lends of feeling of twilight in the summer. I have seen violet and lavender colored twilights here. The painting is very pretty. It does have a feeling about it, "Am I done or not?"
Sergie said, " I don't know if I am an artist or not".
Sergie and I wanted to smoke, so we raised Rosebud's livingroom window. He offered me a cigarette. At first I declined, saying "Oh, I have some". I immediately realized I had committed a mild faux pas . I hurt his feelings a little. I explained to him that I can only smoke filterless cigarettes. I offered him an American Spirit. He took it and gave me one of his, Marlborough, I think. I tore the filter off and smoked it. It was okay. He smoked the Spirit and really enjoyed it. I will try to never turn a cigarette down again when it is offered in a social setting.
Sergie dove into our subject of self-hypnosis. He agreed with us that we convince ourselves, through our beliefs, that something is true. We mostly stayed away from the subject of the war. He said he would not march in protest. He seemed to be a little embarrassed by the effusiveness of the beliefs. He said his friends back home believe that he is stupid because he considers himself an American now. He seemed very fond of this country.
He wanted to know if I am published yet, and I told him I am publishing myself in my blog. Blog is such an ugly and clumsy word, I almost don't want to say it. Perhaps I should say online journal and essays. I told him I didn't know where the writing would go, that it is evolving. I know that I have a vision of words exploding out of me onto this journal. I want to be free and playful with language.
I have been lazy about trying to publish my poems. I think it was something to do with depression also.
Sergie was very gentle and drew both Rosebud and I out of our shells. I was slightly resentful when he first arrived, but I quickly questioned that belief, that assumption, and the night became very beautiful with the enthusiastic sharing of thoughts and beliefs.
After Sergie left, Rosebud and I watched Querelle. I thought it was a very honest portrayal of one man's view of what it is to be male and gay in the modern world. I fell asleep towards the end, and I wonder if I didn't get so sleepy as a kind of defense against the subject matter. There was sadness and exploitation and violence, and the allowing of oneself to be exploited for, what, for sexual pleasure? To be wanted? To feel alive?
Casual sex is a puzzle to me because personally, I have never enjoyed it.
I didn't finish the movie, but I hope to. Rosebud kept saying he liked the film and could relate to some of the attitudes expressed, particularly the one of self-denial and self-repression. This is a very complex and sensitive subject.
It is my belief that the repression of homosexual tendencies leads to a worship of war and the military in some. Particularly if you block out all awareness of your own tendencies. I know that might sound God-awful strange, but I can't help but believe that Rumsfeld is a closet case, and would love to be the man on top.
Yesterday, Rosebud and I rented the Jean Genet film: Querelle . Rosebud had treated me with so much kindness, that I soared for a good part of the evening. My mind had already felt speedy, though I was physically tired.
I had a kind of encounter with Grace. I felt suddenly that everything in the room possessed consciousness. Every cell of human and "inanimate" object glowed with awareness. Of course, the states and conditions of awareness varied. Won't they always vary, yet possess similarity? I felt a mild detachment from concern for the state of the world, for myself as a sentient being. I even felt a kind of it doesn't really matter what happens to us because we will all continue. I don't believe the detachment was a value judgement on the worth of existing, but as a distancing from the "if" of existing.
"If" this or that happens, then this might happen, which might trigger that, and on and on and on.
Rosebud and I discussed the mental traps that become habitual. Paranoia was one that was discussed. I told him that someone shared with me recently this thought: that it is not my business what someone else thinks of me.
I suppose that statement is helpful, up to a point. To extend it, it is my business if someone wants to do harm to me.
Rosebud seemed to like the statement. We also talked about how we hypnotize ourselves with beliefs. When we state a point of view, it is a belief, and therefore is entirely created by the person stating it, and is entirely subjective.
My rant on fascism was a collection of beliefs. Those beliefs will be filtered through the beliefs of others, and they will come to their own views.
We decided it is possible to hypnotize ourselves into believing we have certain physical maladies, so that we hang onto them much longer than is necessary. We believe we are powerless in the face of physical pain. Rosebud's hand hurt and ached. He is convincing himself that he has arthritis. I am afraid he may convince himself that he will always have it. He did seem to suddenly question that assumption as we talked.
Rosebud's artist friend, Sergie from downstairs paid us a visit. He comes from the far east and he likes Wadka. He stated a belief that it is possible to learn to be reasonable when drinking. "The old people,"he said. "When you talk to them, they tell you that they only drink this much", and he held his index finger and thumb apart about 2-3 inches. "I think if you can hold it down to that much, you will be okay."
Rosebud has two paintings of Sergie's on his wall. One painting is of what looks like an alien/human hybrid. The other painting is a bushy, green landscape. Rosebud had told me that Sergie doesn't like his own paintings, and often paints over them. The landscape had been painted on a canvas that was washed with a kind of lavender color. Sergie said the painting is meant to depict summer. The washed out lavender color lends of feeling of twilight in the summer. I have seen violet and lavender colored twilights here. The painting is very pretty. It does have a feeling about it, "Am I done or not?"
Sergie said, " I don't know if I am an artist or not".
Sergie and I wanted to smoke, so we raised Rosebud's livingroom window. He offered me a cigarette. At first I declined, saying "Oh, I have some". I immediately realized I had committed a mild faux pas . I hurt his feelings a little. I explained to him that I can only smoke filterless cigarettes. I offered him an American Spirit. He took it and gave me one of his, Marlborough, I think. I tore the filter off and smoked it. It was okay. He smoked the Spirit and really enjoyed it. I will try to never turn a cigarette down again when it is offered in a social setting.
Sergie dove into our subject of self-hypnosis. He agreed with us that we convince ourselves, through our beliefs, that something is true. We mostly stayed away from the subject of the war. He said he would not march in protest. He seemed to be a little embarrassed by the effusiveness of the beliefs. He said his friends back home believe that he is stupid because he considers himself an American now. He seemed very fond of this country.
He wanted to know if I am published yet, and I told him I am publishing myself in my blog. Blog is such an ugly and clumsy word, I almost don't want to say it. Perhaps I should say online journal and essays. I told him I didn't know where the writing would go, that it is evolving. I know that I have a vision of words exploding out of me onto this journal. I want to be free and playful with language.
I have been lazy about trying to publish my poems. I think it was something to do with depression also.
Sergie was very gentle and drew both Rosebud and I out of our shells. I was slightly resentful when he first arrived, but I quickly questioned that belief, that assumption, and the night became very beautiful with the enthusiastic sharing of thoughts and beliefs.
After Sergie left, Rosebud and I watched Querelle. I thought it was a very honest portrayal of one man's view of what it is to be male and gay in the modern world. I fell asleep towards the end, and I wonder if I didn't get so sleepy as a kind of defense against the subject matter. There was sadness and exploitation and violence, and the allowing of oneself to be exploited for, what, for sexual pleasure? To be wanted? To feel alive?
Casual sex is a puzzle to me because personally, I have never enjoyed it.
I didn't finish the movie, but I hope to. Rosebud kept saying he liked the film and could relate to some of the attitudes expressed, particularly the one of self-denial and self-repression. This is a very complex and sensitive subject.
It is my belief that the repression of homosexual tendencies leads to a worship of war and the military in some. Particularly if you block out all awareness of your own tendencies. I know that might sound God-awful strange, but I can't help but believe that Rumsfeld is a closet case, and would love to be the man on top.
# posted by scorpiorising : 5:11 PM |
Under Construction
I am still learning the art of building templates, so I haven't yet figured out how to include an email and comment section in my blog. Thank you for your viewership, and bare with me as I hope to email contact up and running shortly. Thanks again.
# posted by scorpiorising : 2:01 PM |
Fascism:
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
Oppressive, dictatorial control.
Your Dictionary.com
I have used the word fascism as a descriptive adverb recently in my writings, and I don't think it is fair to use it without explaining myself. It is my belief there is a fascist movement in these United of States. I don't believe that the participants would be able to admit that what they advocate is fascism. I do believe that these same participants are using the framework of our constitution and Declaration of Independence to further their fascist views, particularly the use of one of our basic rights: freedom of speech.
There have been willing victims of this rise of fascism.
"Liberals" have been targeted by the proponents of greater, central control in all phases of our life. The word liberal itself is a dirty word, and there has been an orchestrated attack on liberal views in the national media, so that it is harder for liberal views to be heard. Many liberals have changed their tone and message so as to be assimilated and escape further confrontation and attack. These are the willing victims, the ones who by their complicity in compromising their principals, have furthered the fascist state.
The labeling of the national media as "liberal" is a further attempt to censor the views of liberal. The truth is, the media could never be liberal enough for the advocates of fascism, and they will never be silent until every "liberal" voice in the media is silenced.
We took a giant leap forward towards fascism after the trauma of 9/11, when a huge majority of the nation believed the adequate and right response was to attack Afghanistan. Fascism is the use of military force and might "to surpress the opposition through terror...".
Many "liberals" I am sure would disagree with me when I say we did not need to attack Afghanistan to "win" this war on terror. If anything, attacking that backwards country furthered the cause of Al-Queda. Sadly, we Americans have not had the willingness to back-up our war there with adequate reconstruction efforts, again, furthering the cause of our "enemies".
If we truly believed in our form of government, if we truly thought the practice of American democracy to be decent and just, we would have no qualms that in a war of ideology, our's would win. Otherwise, we would simply leave that country alone if they were'nt willing to accept our way of thinking. Yet, it seems the amount of military might we are willing to throw at a country is proportional to the doubts hidden behind that might. We really don't believe we can win over the Arabs with ideology, with the "goodness" of our beliefs. Not that we have tried that hard, either.
How would one respond to a 9/11 without the use of violence to supress the opposition? Thoughtfully. Very thoughtfully. There would need to be much open discussion and soul searching. Our immediate, again, "fascist" response to 9/11 was to quell open discussion and soul searching, to label it un-patriotic.
"Fascism" is born of the [hidden] belief in helplessness. "Fascism" is a child of violent trauma. Germany became a fascist nation after the violence and trauma of their defeat and humiliation after World War 1, and the Great Depression. There were elements of fascism in all of the Free World before World War 2, including in America. Germany represented the extreme of those views. Institutional racism, an element of fascism, was apparent in the U.S. before WW2. We looked the other way before we joined that war, when reports of the concentration camps were leaking to the general public.
It is my belief that fascism is born of the need to control, of fanaticism. Its bottom emotion is unrecognized fear.
Its tone is schizophrenic. It is unrecognizing of the most important of its true feelings and motives. Its practice is exclusionary and divisive. In the coming months, fascism will become more apparent. If the Patriot Act 2 is passed, we will have become more fascist than democratic.
It is my belief that religious doctrine, as practiced by the Conservative Right in this country, is the philosophical background to this rise of fascism, much as Nietzsche's Superman was to the Germans before WW2. It is the exclusionary tone and rhetoric of the religious right that is the philosophical formula for fascism.
There will be in the coming years more and more "fascist" candidates for office, who attempt to disguise their exclusionary beliefs behind the label of sound economic policy. We must fight these candidates, parish by parish, county by county, state by state.
A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
Oppressive, dictatorial control.
Your Dictionary.com
I have used the word fascism as a descriptive adverb recently in my writings, and I don't think it is fair to use it without explaining myself. It is my belief there is a fascist movement in these United of States. I don't believe that the participants would be able to admit that what they advocate is fascism. I do believe that these same participants are using the framework of our constitution and Declaration of Independence to further their fascist views, particularly the use of one of our basic rights: freedom of speech.
There have been willing victims of this rise of fascism.
"Liberals" have been targeted by the proponents of greater, central control in all phases of our life. The word liberal itself is a dirty word, and there has been an orchestrated attack on liberal views in the national media, so that it is harder for liberal views to be heard. Many liberals have changed their tone and message so as to be assimilated and escape further confrontation and attack. These are the willing victims, the ones who by their complicity in compromising their principals, have furthered the fascist state.
The labeling of the national media as "liberal" is a further attempt to censor the views of liberal. The truth is, the media could never be liberal enough for the advocates of fascism, and they will never be silent until every "liberal" voice in the media is silenced.
We took a giant leap forward towards fascism after the trauma of 9/11, when a huge majority of the nation believed the adequate and right response was to attack Afghanistan. Fascism is the use of military force and might "to surpress the opposition through terror...".
Many "liberals" I am sure would disagree with me when I say we did not need to attack Afghanistan to "win" this war on terror. If anything, attacking that backwards country furthered the cause of Al-Queda. Sadly, we Americans have not had the willingness to back-up our war there with adequate reconstruction efforts, again, furthering the cause of our "enemies".
If we truly believed in our form of government, if we truly thought the practice of American democracy to be decent and just, we would have no qualms that in a war of ideology, our's would win. Otherwise, we would simply leave that country alone if they were'nt willing to accept our way of thinking. Yet, it seems the amount of military might we are willing to throw at a country is proportional to the doubts hidden behind that might. We really don't believe we can win over the Arabs with ideology, with the "goodness" of our beliefs. Not that we have tried that hard, either.
How would one respond to a 9/11 without the use of violence to supress the opposition? Thoughtfully. Very thoughtfully. There would need to be much open discussion and soul searching. Our immediate, again, "fascist" response to 9/11 was to quell open discussion and soul searching, to label it un-patriotic.
"Fascism" is born of the [hidden] belief in helplessness. "Fascism" is a child of violent trauma. Germany became a fascist nation after the violence and trauma of their defeat and humiliation after World War 1, and the Great Depression. There were elements of fascism in all of the Free World before World War 2, including in America. Germany represented the extreme of those views. Institutional racism, an element of fascism, was apparent in the U.S. before WW2. We looked the other way before we joined that war, when reports of the concentration camps were leaking to the general public.
It is my belief that fascism is born of the need to control, of fanaticism. Its bottom emotion is unrecognized fear.
Its tone is schizophrenic. It is unrecognizing of the most important of its true feelings and motives. Its practice is exclusionary and divisive. In the coming months, fascism will become more apparent. If the Patriot Act 2 is passed, we will have become more fascist than democratic.
It is my belief that religious doctrine, as practiced by the Conservative Right in this country, is the philosophical background to this rise of fascism, much as Nietzsche's Superman was to the Germans before WW2. It is the exclusionary tone and rhetoric of the religious right that is the philosophical formula for fascism.
There will be in the coming years more and more "fascist" candidates for office, who attempt to disguise their exclusionary beliefs behind the label of sound economic policy. We must fight these candidates, parish by parish, county by county, state by state.
# posted by scorpiorising : 8:21 AM |
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
What is Real?
The guy who delivered the pastries this morning said, "We're not going to do anything in Iraq."
"Oh yea, right," I said. Lately, I've been in no mood to beat around the bush (no pun intended). "We're only going to go in there and kill thousands of innocent civilians", I said.
He continued to insist, "We're not going to do anything there. We're just going to go in and...", I think he said something about we are going to stir them up against their own leader, or some such nonsense. At that point, without my first cup of coffee, I had had enough.
"Look, I don't know what planet you're living on, but please just, go away; just go away," and I shooed him off.
Yesterday, my boss, the owner, said the Iraqi civilians are all going to come out to greet us when we invade, waving American flags. I told him I thought we would kill thousands of their civilians.
"Maybe one thousand", my boss said.
"It's going to de-stabalize that area", I said.
"No, its going to stabalize it," he said.
"Well, a lot of people are frightened of triggering World War 3 out of all of this," I said.
"Who is saying that?", he wanted to know. "Nobody I know is saying that," he said.
"Everyone I know is saying it", I said.
"Yea, all you left-leaning, liberal types," and he laughed, but he did seem a little stunned that we were considering this could be the beginning of the end. These two encounters leads me to believe that the Americans justifying the war have become adept at rationalizing. Perhaps there is also the naive belief that America has the best of intentions for the rest of the world. I am afraid most are in for a very "real" education.
"Oh yea, right," I said. Lately, I've been in no mood to beat around the bush (no pun intended). "We're only going to go in there and kill thousands of innocent civilians", I said.
He continued to insist, "We're not going to do anything there. We're just going to go in and...", I think he said something about we are going to stir them up against their own leader, or some such nonsense. At that point, without my first cup of coffee, I had had enough.
"Look, I don't know what planet you're living on, but please just, go away; just go away," and I shooed him off.
Yesterday, my boss, the owner, said the Iraqi civilians are all going to come out to greet us when we invade, waving American flags. I told him I thought we would kill thousands of their civilians.
"Maybe one thousand", my boss said.
"It's going to de-stabalize that area", I said.
"No, its going to stabalize it," he said.
"Well, a lot of people are frightened of triggering World War 3 out of all of this," I said.
"Who is saying that?", he wanted to know. "Nobody I know is saying that," he said.
"Everyone I know is saying it", I said.
"Yea, all you left-leaning, liberal types," and he laughed, but he did seem a little stunned that we were considering this could be the beginning of the end. These two encounters leads me to believe that the Americans justifying the war have become adept at rationalizing. Perhaps there is also the naive belief that America has the best of intentions for the rest of the world. I am afraid most are in for a very "real" education.
# posted by scorpiorising : 1:28 PM |
Monday, February 17, 2003
Damn the Corporate Media
I just saw a Human Shield fellow interviewed on MSNBC. The corporate fascist reporter asked the fellow if he wanted Saddam Hussein to remain in power. The human shield responded in a very thoughtful manner. He said we as a nation don't have the right to dictate who the leader of another country should be, and we don't know enough about the Iraqi people to make that assumption. He also said it is the arrogance of the American people to think that they know best what the rest of the world ought to be doing. He said he thought President Bush is promoting the war in the economic interests of the United States and certain American Companies--and the reporter cut him off.
"That's all we have time for" period. Very telling.
Watch Frontline on Thursday, February 20, and see true journalistic courage in action, as they will deal with the corporate reasons that we are going to war with Iraq, the reasons not reported by the CNNs and the Foxes.
"That's all we have time for" period. Very telling.
Watch Frontline on Thursday, February 20, and see true journalistic courage in action, as they will deal with the corporate reasons that we are going to war with Iraq, the reasons not reported by the CNNs and the Foxes.
# posted by scorpiorising : 5:25 PM |
Sunday, February 16, 2003
Sedition: Conduct or Language Inciting rebellion against the authority of a state, Your Dictionary.com
I heard Howard Zinn on NPR recently, debating a fascist educator. I say fascist, because the educator, whose name I can't remember, seemed to believe that one of the primary purposes of education is to glorify our country in the eyes of our children. He accused Zinn of "trashing" our country's history. Zinn defended the right of any citizen to a critical examination of our country's history. He seemed to favor teaching children the power of critical reasoning. Zinn is the author of The Declaration of Independence: Cross-Examining American Ideology. I'm just getting into the book, so I can't claim to know all there is to know about Zinn's thoughts, except to say that he favors critical analysis of American decision making, particularly in the realm of foreign policy. He says this about our foundation as a nation:
The American Declaration of Independence, however, clearly
understood that difference of interest between government
and citizen. It says that the purpose of government is to secure
certain rights for its citizens--life, liberty, equality, and the
pursuit of happiness. But government may not fullfill these
purposes, and so "whenever any form of government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute
new government".
I am not suggesting the use of violence to overthrow our government. But what I am suggesting is that we all find ways to behave in a most non-violent, seditious manner, to challenge the current powers that be. There is no more time to be complacent. We must find a way to convince our brothers and sisters in this, our country, that they are wrong. It is seditious to value life. It is seditious to value the animals. It is seditious to value flowers. It is seditious to value clean air, clean water, pesticide-free food.
It is seditious to value creativity above profit. It is seditious to value the lives of our brothers and sisters in other countries. It is seditious to want to eliminate homelessness. It is seditious to place the priority of our children's needs above all else. It is seditious to place the safety of our children above all else. It is seditious...
The American Declaration of Independence, however, clearly
understood that difference of interest between government
and citizen. It says that the purpose of government is to secure
certain rights for its citizens--life, liberty, equality, and the
pursuit of happiness. But government may not fullfill these
purposes, and so "whenever any form of government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute
new government".
I am not suggesting the use of violence to overthrow our government. But what I am suggesting is that we all find ways to behave in a most non-violent, seditious manner, to challenge the current powers that be. There is no more time to be complacent. We must find a way to convince our brothers and sisters in this, our country, that they are wrong. It is seditious to value life. It is seditious to value the animals. It is seditious to value flowers. It is seditious to value clean air, clean water, pesticide-free food.
It is seditious to value creativity above profit. It is seditious to value the lives of our brothers and sisters in other countries. It is seditious to want to eliminate homelessness. It is seditious to place the priority of our children's needs above all else. It is seditious to place the safety of our children above all else. It is seditious...
# posted by scorpiorising : 5:11 PM |
Links
- Google News
- HOME
- Contact Me
- WAR CASUALTIES(MY OTHER BLOG)
- BAGHDAD BURNING
- UNQUALIFIED OFFERINGS
- JUAN COLE*INFORMED COMMENT*
- BRAD DELONG
- TOMPAINE.COM
- THE DAILY HOWLER
- DISSENT MAGAZINE
- CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY
- BLAH3.COM
- BLACK SUNDAE
- WAMPUM
- ESCHATON
- ARMS AND THE MAN
- MILL ON LIBERTY
- GERMANY IN WORLD WAR 2
- VEILED 4 ALLAH
- BUSY, BUSY, BUSY
- UNENVIABLE SITUATION
- HOW TO SAVE THE WORLD
- MATTHEW GROSS
- WHISKEY BAR
- WAR AND PIECE
- DAILY KOS
- GREG PALAST
- BLACK COMMENTATOR
- SURPRISING PATTERN OF FLORIDA'S ELECTION RESULTS
- THE BRAD BLOG
- THE OPEN VOTING CONSORTIUM
- BLACK BOX VOTING
- THE FREE PRESS
- VOTERGATE.TV
- STOLEN ELECTION. AMERICA HIJACKED
- An examination of the Florida election
- blueflu.us
- U.S. Election Controversies and Irregularities
- MY DD
- SEEING THE FOREST
- THERE IS NO CRISIS
- VELVET REVOLUTION
- 02/02/2003 - 02/09/2003
- 02/09/2003 - 02/16/2003
- 02/16/2003 - 02/23/2003
- 02/23/2003 - 03/02/2003
- 03/02/2003 - 03/09/2003
- 03/09/2003 - 03/16/2003
- 03/16/2003 - 03/23/2003
- 03/23/2003 - 03/30/2003
- 03/30/2003 - 04/06/2003
- 04/06/2003 - 04/13/2003
- 04/13/2003 - 04/20/2003
- 04/20/2003 - 04/27/2003
- 04/27/2003 - 05/04/2003
- 05/04/2003 - 05/11/2003
- 05/11/2003 - 05/18/2003
- 05/18/2003 - 05/25/2003
- 05/25/2003 - 06/01/2003
- 06/01/2003 - 06/08/2003
- 06/08/2003 - 06/15/2003
- 06/15/2003 - 06/22/2003
- 06/22/2003 - 06/29/2003
- 06/29/2003 - 07/06/2003
- 07/06/2003 - 07/13/2003
- 07/13/2003 - 07/20/2003
- 07/20/2003 - 07/27/2003
- 07/27/2003 - 08/03/2003
- 08/03/2003 - 08/10/2003
- 08/10/2003 - 08/17/2003
- 08/17/2003 - 08/24/2003
- 09/07/2003 - 09/14/2003
- 09/14/2003 - 09/21/2003
- 09/21/2003 - 09/28/2003
- 09/28/2003 - 10/05/2003
- 10/05/2003 - 10/12/2003
- 10/12/2003 - 10/19/2003
- 10/19/2003 - 10/26/2003
- 10/26/2003 - 11/02/2003
- 11/02/2003 - 11/09/2003
- 11/09/2003 - 11/16/2003
- 11/16/2003 - 11/23/2003
- 11/23/2003 - 11/30/2003
- 11/30/2003 - 12/07/2003
- 12/14/2003 - 12/21/2003
- 01/11/2004 - 01/18/2004
- 01/18/2004 - 01/25/2004
- 01/25/2004 - 02/01/2004
- 02/01/2004 - 02/08/2004
- 02/08/2004 - 02/15/2004
- 02/22/2004 - 02/29/2004
- 05/23/2004 - 05/30/2004
- 09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004
- 10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004
- 10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004
- 10/17/2004 - 10/24/2004
- 10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004
- 10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004
- 11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004
- 11/14/2004 - 11/21/2004
- 11/21/2004 - 11/28/2004
- 11/28/2004 - 12/05/2004
- 12/05/2004 - 12/12/2004
- 12/19/2004 - 12/26/2004
- 12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005
- 01/02/2005 - 01/09/2005
- 01/09/2005 - 01/16/2005
- 01/23/2005 - 01/30/2005
- 01/30/2005 - 02/06/2005
- 02/06/2005 - 02/13/2005
- 02/13/2005 - 02/20/2005
- 02/20/2005 - 02/27/2005
- 02/27/2005 - 03/06/2005
- 03/06/2005 - 03/13/2005
- 03/13/2005 - 03/20/2005
- 03/20/2005 - 03/27/2005
- 03/27/2005 - 04/03/2005
- 04/03/2005 - 04/10/2005
- 04/24/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 06/05/2005 - 06/12/2005
- 06/26/2005 - 07/03/2005
- 07/31/2005 - 08/07/2005
- 08/07/2005 - 08/14/2005